>>26880502Do you not know what subjective means?you say Y fags are idiots with the inability to refute yet your entire post looks like it was written by a 16 year old trying to fit in.
>Objective. X's stand out. Y's do not. Objective means its a fact, you stated an oppinion. And while it's colors do make it stand out, the colors used to stand out are completely out of no where for a mega evolution. Name one other pokemon that completely changes its color pallets. Lati@s makes sense as to why it did this, charizard does not have this excuse.
>Tattered messes of wings vs. a design element no Pokemon has. Point X.Tattered messes of wings? So you mean exactly what X has? It's wings look like garbage and Im not just saying that because I don't like it. I'm being genuine when I say it looks terrible. Whoever thought it was a good idea to give him one long wing and then treat it like a paper snowflake was an idiot
>Refuted above and belowYou really didn't. All you said was that it's wings were Tattered and he looks weak. This dosent prove that his color scheme isn't the only thing keeping him from being distinct.
>Objective. Y's limbs are proportionately smaller than base Charizard's, making it appear weaker. Only its wings are larger, and they appear fragile and tattered.Again, not how you use objective. It's smaller to make it appear more aerial dynamic, because like base charizard, it's a flying type. Not a dragon. And how you say Y's wings are Tattered and yet you still like X is beyond me.
>Emboar is not Charizard YYou're right. Emboar looks like shit which is why I mentioned him. Fire beards arent as great as you think
