>>27032646I don't have one but I'll go see if I can dig one up. It's probably in an archive at the very least.
>>27032703I know that has been speculated about for a while, but that's besides the point. All I'm saying is that it's possible, and it's odd that the OP from that thread last night talked about it in such detail, only to see such a thing show up today. Is it a coincidence? Probably. That thread wasn't convincing. But it's possible that it is real.
When I said "solid evidence", I never said it was definitive evidence. I was saying that it is solid as in tangible. It's not just someone typing up nonsense. Does that make it more real? Not necessarily, but if it WERE real, we'd actually have an idea of what it looks like.
There are plenty of ways around this being fake - if it's an early build, animations are usually rough/incomplete.
Yes, the 25/25 appears to have two upside-down fives, but one thing that no one has mentioned yet is why someone making a fake would take the time to make such a thing that stands out as fake as opposed to making regular "2"s. The latter is much easier for a faker and it looks more legitimate. Why would they purposely put in more effort AND jeopardise their own fake?
It really isn't ludicrous to expect any kind of leaks. Just because there isn't a precedent as such, doesn't mean it can't happen. These games have been in development for years now, so they're close to being completed. It's not implausible. Denying the possibility that this is real just makes you a close-minded fool.
>>27032762Oh, I don't disagree, but it's still a possibility that it has some other intention, such as
>>27032805 and if it is real but early in development, then it could also be an early graphic.
