/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #27062730

[98 / 16 / ?]

ITT we politely rate Pokemon designs by generation

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:31:59 No.27062730 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>27062852 >>27062874 >>27062927 >>27062960 >>27063017 >>27063142 >>27063581 >>27063592 >>27063682 >>27063911 >>27068294 >>27071354 >>27071403 >>27071595 >>27071680 >>27071892 >>27073399 >>27078647

Gen 1 > Gen 3 > Gen 2 > Gen 4 > Gen 5 >Gen 6

TopKec !UNSTjHdDlA

TopKec !UNSTjHdDlA Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:33:49 No.27062775 Report

Quoted By: >>27062999 >>27063504 >>27068051

imo it's V > 2 > 6 > 1 > 3 > 4. All have some good mons, though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:34:48 No.27062794 Report

Quoted By: >>27078653

5 > 2 > 1=3 > 6 >>>>>> 4

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1460844562954.png, 164KiB, 800x587

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:34:48 No.27062795 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 4 > 1 > 6 > 3 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:37:31 No.27062852 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
2 > 5 > 6 > 7(?) > 4 > 3 > 1
I've just seen gen 1 mons too many times.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 26770842.jpg, 32KiB, 600x800

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:38:20 No.27062874 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:40:05 No.27062918 Report

Quoted By: >>27081348 >>27081496

Gen 4 = Gen 1 > Gen 6 > Gen 2 = Gen 5 > Gen 3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:40:34 No.27062927 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
>Not liking gen 6 pokemon designs
If GF did one thing right in gen 6, it was the pokemon desings

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:41:59 No.27062960 Report

Quoted By: >>27071631

>>27062730
6 > 7 > 5 > 2 > 1 > 3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:42:10 No.27062966 Report

Quoted By: >>27065585

1=2=3=4=5=6
Fite me m8

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:43:48 No.27062999 Report

Quoted By: >>27063134

>>27062775
>roman numeral and then regular numbers
Why are trips so fucking stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:44:33 No.27063017 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
5 > 3 > 4 > 6 > 2 >>> 1

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1467854092812.png, 127KiB, 437x447

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:47:14 No.27063085 Report

Quoted By: >>27066671

Odd Generations > Even Generations

Fact.

TopKec !UNSTjHdDlA

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1464395067681.gif, 200KiB, 482x348

TopKec !UNSTjHdDlA Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:49:48 No.27063134 Report

Quoted By: >>27063162

>>27062999
V instead of 5 is actually just a habit of mine, sorry for triggering you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:50:24 No.27063142 Report

Quoted By: >>27063163

>>27062730
what the fuck is the purple grub from
it seems so familiar

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:50:25 No.27063143 Report

Quoted By:

>not liking gen 6 designs
Jesus, this board needs to be cleansed.

6 > 5 > 1 > 3 > 4 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:50:38 No.27063148 Report

Quoted By:

5>3>4>6>2>1

7 would be before 4 from what i've seen so far but we dont know all yet

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:51:06 No.27063162 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063134
If you didn't use a trip, it wouldn't be so well known that you're mentally handicapped. Just a tip, seeing as you clearly need any help you can get.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:51:08 No.27063163 Report

Quoted By: >>27063181

>>27063142
It's an enemy from Pikmin.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:51:58 No.27063181 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063163
FUCKING
THANK
YOU

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:52:52 No.27063207 Report

Quoted By: >>27063241

1=5>3>6>>2>>>4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 19:54:15 No.27063241 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063207
Ya blew it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:08:35 No.27063504 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062775
I honestly tend to write the Roman Numeral for 5 as well. I have no idea why. Also, good taste. I'd switch 4 and 3 though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:09:23 No.27063519 Report

Quoted By:

6>4>3>2>5>1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:10:39 No.27063549 Report

Quoted By: >>27063574

1 = 3 > 2 = 4 > 6 = 5

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:11:07 No.27063557 Report

Quoted By:

4>5=6>1>3>2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:11:45 No.27063574 Report

Quoted By: >>27064240

>>27063549
>6 and 5 are the worst

Nigga.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:11:57 No.27063578 Report

Quoted By: >>27063865 >>27064004 >>27071600 >>27077841

>Gen 4 not always being the last.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:12:15 No.27063581 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
1 = 4 > 3 > 2 = 6 = 5

Then again there are generally very few Pokemon designs I outright dislike, so I'm probably being a little too generous.

I'm liking Gen 7's a lot so far. I'd put what I've seen so far up there with Gen 3.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:13:09 No.27063592 Report

Quoted By: >>27063658

>>27062730
Only my tastes gentle anons.

Design-wise:
3=5=6>4>1>2>7

Region-wise
3>4>1>2>6>5

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1466369040224.jpg, 12KiB, 252x315

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:15:46 No.27063658 Report

Quoted By: >>27063745

>>27063592
>Region-wise
>3>

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:15:51 No.27063660 Report

Quoted By:

5 = 1 = 6 > 2 = 3 >>>>>>>> 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:16:32 No.27063682 Report

Quoted By: >>27078431 >>27081536

>>27062730
Design wise:
3=2>1>4>5=6
Region wise:
5=2>4>3=1>6
Just fuck Kalos in general.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:20:09 No.27063745 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063658
RSE, not ORAS.
I love the diversity of it (Volcano, desert, Ice cave, mysterious underwater caverns, Regi secrets etc..., pacific wood city, Treeborn village. Huge grass raining road...)
Again, it's only my tastes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:22:56 No.27063804 Report

Quoted By:

2>1>6>5>4>3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:26:05 No.27063865 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063578

Nah chill

Starters and Gen 2 evo's are god tier

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:27:53 No.27063894 Report

Quoted By: >>27067538

I can't really hate any of them

There's always a great design

You can't be too harsh to gen 5 since it was supposed to be a complete new Pokemon allowed only, there's bound to be dumb designs

My least favorite would have to be gen 2 only because some the template for designs were trash, but that doesn't mean I don't love some of them

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:28:40 No.27063911 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
1>5>3>2>6>4>7

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:29:39 No.27063928 Report

Quoted By:

Design wise Kalos has great Pokemon despite it's low number

Region wise Kalos is just garbage

I will never stop getting upset at how stupid this map is

That giant snow mountain is literally nothing on the inside, and the desert is so out of place

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1464493731642.jpg, 35KiB, 542x639

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:30:07 No.27063936 Report

Quoted By: >>27064004

>Any list not having Gen 4 as last place

nice bait

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1427075892904.png, 11KiB, 500x500

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:32:51 No.27063982 Report

Quoted By:

6 > 5 > 1 > 2 > 3 > 4
And so far 7 looks like it could top 6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:34:06 No.27064004 Report

Quoted By: >>27067914

>>27063936
>>27063578

Suck my dick

Gen 4 did gen 2 better and I'm a fucking johto fag

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 20:46:39 No.27064240 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063574
They are.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 21:27:00 No.27064993 Report

Quoted By: >>27066788

4>5>1>2>3>6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 21:47:27 No.27065354 Report

Quoted By:

3 > 1 > 6 > 4 > 5 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 21:54:58 No.27065478 Report

Quoted By: >>27078731

2>3>1>6>4>5

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 22:00:07 No.27065585 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062966
This. But If I have to rank them, then 6>3=4>5>1>2

Gen 6 has a lot top designs for me, when gen 2 doesn't, but I accept all Pokémon and like them, some are kinda shit, obviously.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 22:53:27 No.27066671 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063085
It's generally true, I liked 2 a lot more than 3 or 1 though despite it not introducing that many pokemon

For something like this you just have to assume that 1 had the best designs, anyone posting otherwise is just trolling because gen 1 defines what pokemon look like to a large degree. When someone calls something a digimon or not a pokemon it's in reference to the ideal established in gen 1.

1 > 5 > 2 > 3 > 6 > 4 desu, 4 was just an awful gen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 22:58:55 No.27066788 Report

Quoted By:

>>27064993
I would switch 3 and 2 but good list

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 23:20:25 No.27067186 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 3 > 4 > 2 > 1 > 6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jul 2016 23:42:27 No.27067538 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063894
this so much
all gens have good and bad designs

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO man-in-pig-costume-being-arrested.jpg, 35KiB, 349x262

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 00:04:11 No.27067914 Report

Quoted By:

>>27064004
TAKE THIS FILTH AWAY JOHNSON, JESUS CHRIST IT'S DISGUSTING

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 00:12:05 No.27068051 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062775
I would more or less agree

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO everythingisayisright.jpg, 32KiB, 550x343

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 00:30:21 No.27068294 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
1>3>2>5>6>4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:10:45 No.27071354 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
I'm biased but aren't we all?

Based solely on designs, I would rate them:
4>2>5>1>3>6>7

I'm really not a fan of these new designs. Especially if they're showing off their best ones first. Hopefully my opinion changes when the games are released.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:13:15 No.27071403 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
4>2=5>3>1=6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:16:06 No.27071461 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2 > 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:17:17 No.27071484 Report

Quoted By:

2>5>3>4=6>1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:20:10 No.27071549 Report

Quoted By:

5>2>4>1>3>6

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 7eaaba3011b6fcf3326f3e59d481183d.png, 288KiB, 542x639

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:22:16 No.27071595 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
Odd, your list is the same as mine
Good taste.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:22:17 No.27071597 Report

Quoted By:

3>5>6>2>1>4

I'm not including 7 until it's released.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:22:22 No.27071600 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063578
>Gen 1 not being always being last

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:23:42 No.27071631 Report

Quoted By:

6 > 2 > 5 > 4 > 7 > 1 > 3

>>27062960
Good taste.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:25:37 No.27071680 Report

Quoted By: >>27071833

>>27062730
Gen I > Gen II > Gen V > (Gen VII) > Gen IV > Gen VI > Gen III

this is the only correct order.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:30:06 No.27071808 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 2 = 3 > 1 > 4 > 6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:31:08 No.27071833 Report

Quoted By:

>>27071680
>Gen 1 being first
There are so much crap in RBY, and is probably equal to all the crappy pokemon in later games.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1432031680312.png, 102KiB, 242x259

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:33:29 No.27071892 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
Designs?

1 > 5 > 3 > 2 > 4 > 6

Also >>27071542

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 03:34:39 No.27071917 Report

Quoted By:

1>2>4>3=5=6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 04:01:24 No.27072416 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 3 > 2 > 4 > 6 > 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 04:07:55 No.27072530 Report

Quoted By:

2 > 1 > 3 > 6 > 5 > 4 > 7

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 04:55:06 No.27073356 Report

Quoted By:

1>2>3>4>5>6>7

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 04:55:55 No.27073375 Report

Quoted By:

2 > 4 > 3 > 1 > 6 > 5
Apprehensively placing 7 somewhere around 4 and 3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 04:57:18 No.27073399 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
4>1>5>2>6>3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 05:00:14 No.27073457 Report

Quoted By:

5>4>6>3>2>1

i have no nostalgia for the often boring designs of gen 1. things like raticate, fearow, and persian are fine but not interesting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 05:07:05 No.27073599 Report

Quoted By:

Gen 1 >>Gen 2 >>>>>>>Gen 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gen 6 >>>>>> Gen 5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Digimon>>>>>>>>>>>Gen 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 08:28:35 No.27076567 Report

Quoted By:

5>6>2=3=4>1
Sure, every generation has its good and bad mons, but I gotta say, for the gen that started everything, gen 1 is very bland. 5 is first because it has a lot of mons, therefore we find more that I like there, but let's just say I like ice cream better than a pile of shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 08:37:10 No.27076653 Report

Quoted By:

ITT: Retards who dislike Gen 4 prove they have zero taste.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 10:37:54 No.27077727 Report

Quoted By:

2>1>3>6>4>>>>>>>>>>5

Jesus christ, Unova was terrible

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1424987660490.png, 261KiB, 500x500

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 10:41:11 No.27077753 Report

Quoted By:

5>4>6>1>2>3

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 10:49:18 No.27077841 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063578
>Toxicroak and Croagunk in Gen 4
>not automatically the best

I completely respect your opinion

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 12:14:42 No.27078431 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063682
This guy gets it.
Fuck Kalos.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 12:37:56 No.27078606 Report

Quoted By:

5 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 4 > 2

I felt like 2 was a really weird point where they had great designs that just didn't make it into Red/Blue and the rest were awful back-up designs rushed into a second game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 12:43:10 No.27078647 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062730
6 > 2 > 3 > 5 > 1 > 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 12:43:42 No.27078653 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062794
i agree with this completely. and then 7 might be just as good as 5. looks like it so far anyway.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 12:54:27 No.27078731 Report

Quoted By:

>>27065478
I guess this is close to mine
2>3>6>1>4>5
and I'm not entirely sure about that order for 1, 4 and 6

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 13:53:55 No.27079090 Report

Quoted By:

3>1>6>2>5>4>7

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1450562468495.jpg, 28KiB, 500x524

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:40:14 No.27081167 Report

Quoted By:

1 = 3 > 6 = 7 (so far) > 5 = 2 > 4

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:43:06 No.27081219 Report

Quoted By:

7 > 6 > 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1

they just keep getting better, fact

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:49:23 No.27081348 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062918
This.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:57:34 No.27081496 Report

Quoted By:

>>27062918
yup

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:59:31 No.27081528 Report

Quoted By:

Pfft... Anyone who says Gen 1 design is remotely superior to Gen 3 or 4 is highly uneducated.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 16:59:54 No.27081536 Report

Quoted By:

>>27063682
Thankfully we only had to visit it for a single pair of games.
Truly, Game Freak is merciful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 17:04:51 No.27081608 Report

Quoted By:

1=2=3=4=5=6=7
they all hold a special place in my heart

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 17:13:28 No.27081734 Report

Quoted By:

1=2>>shit=everything else

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1468022124913.jpg, 102KiB, 600x970

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 17:30:59 No.27082013 Report

Quoted By:

Last time I played Pokemon it was the 90s and they were Gen 1 (Red and Blue) on Gameboy Color. Fun as fuck times but for some reason I didn't keep playing.

Now I want to sit outside on my hammock and enjoy Pokemon once again. Got a 3DS, which Pokemon games should I get? I know nothing about this series since Gen 1.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 17:58:57 No.27082525 Report

Quoted By:

1 =/> 5 > 3 > 4 =/> 2 > 6

Feel free to agree.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO reee.png, 462KiB, 440x770

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 18:07:57 No.27082677 Report

Quoted By:

3>6>4>1/5>2

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 Jul 2016 19:37:33 No.27084300 Report

Quoted By:

2 > 1 = 3 = 5 = 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

ITT we politely rate Pokemon designs by generation