>>27072969i'm not seeing the problem, so what, it's a little synthy you fuck, stop reaching
but hey, at least you're not this ass hole cockmaster
>>27072631>You're right, I guess I'm spoiled for expecting a good game.I would do the same as you and counter all your points, but is that really necessary? character attacks aside, you act as though the lens through which your inane criticisms are valid is that of a completely new player, and as much as we joke and poke at pokemon for being too easy, do you really think someone going in blind wouldnt be impressed and/or insanely confused at all the information and mechanics they'd have to adjust to?
no you know what, i shifted gears to more peeved while typing this, I'll counter your arguments
>Both XY and ORAS are.look at that punctuation, that is the most smug period I've ever seen, like a crazy girlfriend in the midst of getting mad at you when she cheated on you - there's no argument there, you just say they are. I'm not even going to pull that "giving you credit in disagreement" thing and say "well XY was the first 3D blahblah-" crap, XY were the most RPG like pokemon has ever felt, the music, I thought at least, was great bar for maybe one or two tracks, the pokemon were great, the world was varied and yet still maintained an aesthetic consistent to what it wanted; a fresh region taking history into account, palaces everywhere, with the occasional extreme biome, desert, snow, marsh, all tied together with one of the best stories pokemon has managed to introduce in a simple package we've had in quite some time. And that's without the multi-dimensions crap ORAS bought in to both enhance and complicate the universe. they're worldbuilding, you're what, complaining using one sentence with an undeservedly smug period on it? fuck you, you little asshole.
>Unless you started with ORAS, why would you care?They'd care about the legendaries because like anything else in a game ever, it's a big exciting secret -
