>>27139422>>271394713/3
To be honest I don't even want this to happen, we'd be better off without it. But in case it does and, to wrap up: what are the main points you think this has to hit for it to be the Lego Movie of Pokémon?
I already mentioned how much I think we need the brightness of it all. I would really like a standalone story, something really fresh and cool, something different, but if this was the only opportunity and we could make whatever we want out of it to make it THE Pokémon movie(s) then I personally would prefer a trilogy, fully flegded out characters including the Pokémon themselves, not to mention we could get decent screentime for a ton of Pokémon from all generations. We could get a rotating team for the main character and stuff, and we could go from the moment he gets his starter
which doesn't need to be a regular starter to the moment he saves the world and becomes the champion, whatever happens first. With two or even more hours per movie, you have good space to fit in what I would want in them: the adventure, the diversity, the comfy, the danger, the suspense and drama, the actual epicness, the passion, the competition, the lore, and all that autistic jazz we've all fallen in love with regardless of our individual differences. Isn't Pokémon amazing? Pokémon deserves to be handled with extreme care, or it'd loose all its charm.
I genuinely believe that, in the right hands, a Pokémon live action
cinematic universe can not only deliver to its fans, but also tell great stories that evoke the same feeling, the same heart and soul that caught us all to begin with.
