>>27327634Just so we're clear, what exactly is so "edgy" about them?
>>27327794Yes, Pinnister/Ballio/whatever just so happens to be a sea lion with a clown theme.
So what, big whoop, people are getting their trousers rustled just because he just so happens to remind them of a monster that just so happens to take shape of a clown from a honestly god awful adaptation of actual literature with only its actor being its redeeming factor.
And this shit's going to have another fucking movie of which I'll assume to be pretty crappy as well. I'll try to at least recognize their efforts of cashing in on another remake/remastering.Is it that hard for people to get their mind out of the gutter
pun not intended and to merely see him as just a sea lion that just so happens to have these design traits?
I know people have their own fear of clowns and I do not blame them, but most of the time, I just think it was all learned from all the bad exposure clowns generally have in most media. Fear is taught, not something you're just born with, which is why I'm generally upset that clowns (the whole concept in general) have barely anything good of a example to make people realize they're not that bad either.
Yes, the cat is a panther. I assume you never seen one. What's wrong with the panther being a panther? From all the clustered designs to the simplest designs we just so happened to get all these years, why is this one so bad, considering it's merely a simple design that doesn't happen to shove fire all over it? We've literally had horses merely with fire, we've had pidgeons looking merely like pidgeons, what's the conundrum here?
And why are people forgetting the fact that owls are indeed birds of prey? And why do they feel the need to clamor its design as edgy when it's simply putting focus on that actual fact and expanding towards it and giving it a theme that tries to make sense with it? By that definition, all owls are edgy.
