>>27336607>1: StampsI could do that in MS paint
>2: Same artstyle The general design actually look extremely out of place compared to the Pokemon that have been announced for this gen so far, so no, this isn't a reason that makes them seem real
>3: Tint is differentDifferent from what? Hell, I'll give you this vague-ass "reason" because it still wouldn't be enough for this shit to hold water
>4: Rowlet has powerful kicks and fires razor sharp leaves i.e. Giant legs and archerThese "leaks" came AFTER we knew this about Rowlet, so it's not an argument for them to be real
>5: The three BsSee my response to reason 3
>6: Starter patternsHow did your precious Patterns work out when Pokemon Z came out, huh? Or Pokemon Gray?
>7: The artist hasn't come forwardDoesn't confirm it
>8: Not first leaked on 4chanDoesn't confirm it
>9: Masuda and Ohmari-fuck said they were adding more emotion, explains why it's so cluttered and they have different emotions.Pokemon have always expressed emotion, and in fact, if anything, the fact that Litten's evo expresses so much emotion in its face should almost be another reason it's fake, seeing as how the description for Litten paints it as autism-levels of non-emotive. And also, they were referring to the pokemons' animations with this, not their design specifically.
>10: No one has actually successfully debunked it.This isn't a reason to think something is real
