>>27417432>theories about what they could have.Are you being purposely retarded? Because that anon did not say anything about more pokémon but weaker, he said more pokémon. Stop spinning what other say to suit your mental disability. How can you possibly argue that more pokémon does not make a trainer inherently more difficult? If "theories" or whatever you say, is not allowed, then what is there to discuss? That having more pokémon automatically makes those pokémon weaker? Do you design these games and make those decisions?
>it's a weaker trainer, periodThis is completely baseless speculation, and would vary wildly based on the team composition of the trainer and yourself. Embarrasing, really.
The only problem with having more pokémon on trainers is that exp scaling gets fucking retarded because Gamefreak can't balance this for shit. With the current exp mechanics it would simply not work. Then again, the entire system needs to be burned to the ground at this point in time. I would gladly have fewer trainers with more pokémon.
