>>27431341>>27431361>>27431391>>27431491I mean, I could understand if you're twelve and you just think they're cool, but people have yet to give reasons as to why the ones in the OP are well designed.
For example, it's kind of funny that the designer had to pull a hood out of his ass to make the archer owl idea work. Even then, [thing human does] + animal is probably the laziest type of design next to just making it a recolored animal.
There's no inspiration there, just the age-old trope of an animal doing a human thing.