>>27557555>>a children's game would be ruined by a small, non-intrusive referenceAll it would likely be, too. I doubt Nintendo would be willing to shell it out for more than a single small one over something that ripped them off to begin with. Odds are they'll just sneak something Disney won't notice right away in that they think Disney won't think is worth suing over. If that will lead to too much "Meme Hell" for guys like
>>27557555, they need to find something else that isn't internet to do.
