>>27595110>Bows are made of wood.Exactly. Being a grass type it could have done that. Instead it has a bow made of an articulated limb. Absolutely stupid.
>And its bowstring is a vine.And it's also a hood cord. Even more retarded, not only it lacks the tension to shoot an arrow, it would just close the hood whenever pulled just like it's shown in OP's pic.
>It uses its grass type to form the weapon out of its own body.Instead of actually attacking with it's grass type. 10/10 grass starter concept.
>Pulling one vine wouldn't close the hood.look again
>The arrow heads look like autumn leaveToo bad it's not.
>>27595173>Owls are known for their impeccable sightThanks, whats next are you going to tell me owls can fly too?
A shit ton of animals have good vision, does that make them lol archers too? And why does it need glasses when it has such a good vision?
>Why wouldn't it be an archer? Why would it be? Archers and owls are completely unrelated unlike seals and fairies and tigers and wrestling. They picked a random animal and tried to force a random archetype, I guess that's why the bow makes so little sense.
>You're just desperate.I wish. Those flaws are fucking obvious. You are the desperate one since there's no way to defend it.
Concept is shit, bow is fucking stupid, design it's a clusterfuck, and its grass type is barely an afterthougth. Or just a piece of cloth.
