>>27649328Great that you "believe" me, but to be honest couldn't care less if you did. Let's break down your counter argument. That somehow be being too young made my original, logically based argument null and void. Bad part is that this isn't even a counter argument, but a basic slime tactic when one doesn't have a valid counter argument. Your only argument starts with, "Haven't seen megas in the newest material, ergo no megas in new game." Which my counter was to state that pokemon has never gotten rid of an evolution. So, I still state the logical conclusion to my first statement, "megas are here to stay". Now let me act as sorta forseer of the future, your next responce will be again to attack me and not my central argument. Which still means you don't have a valid counter argument.
