>>27716992fave dexes IMO are the same that introduced the most new pokemon. it may be pure coincidence as more new thing means more to like but the fact is if you make 100 new designs i could like let's say 60 or 40. but if you only make 50 the chances are we could as easily end up with less than half the pokemon we would like, depending on our tastes.
is that simple, i don't hate old pokemon in new games. but i do wish they were at the minimum possible, in cases that make sense with the region or where they REALLY needed to fill that type or something and didn't have something new and cool to fill the void. in kalos and this, for now, it doesn't look like they used the old mons to complete the dex, more like "remember you can't make that much new things because we NEED to have X amount of old pokemon, especially kantos"
>>27717154love the new forms, and it would be a given but we already have kalos with a shitton of kanto mons.
i completely understand and can tolerate the reason behind it, but i kinda wish it wasn't the case
i always have in mind that we are a secondary target for GF and the pokemon company, little kids SHOULD and are the focus. for example i don't love that alola have a lot more cute pokemon than edgy ones, although i got why and still really like most, almost all, of the new pokemon.
