>>27937690What do you mean? I really dont understand
>>27937671I agree with everything but that last part. I was refering mostly to people who actually play with amie for its functionality as a sort of "pet sim" if anything.
You're right that people will generally go for the least aggresive looking one, but not every team has a gardevoir. I'd suspect it would be high in the most played pokemon in amie, but you have to admit there has to be more to it than just it being a neat design.
>>27937723I know, but its isn't that stupid when there's a legitimate argument behind it. Or are you going to dismiss anything because they say "the mayority of people X" when backed by proof? I'm not saying every person with a gardevoir is a fucking degenerate, I'm saying a portion of them are, and those are most likely a big part of why its the #1 most played with pokemon in amie
