>>28059229Perhaps because you actually try to backtrack and/or fail to address my points so pointing out these faults in your argument as actual faults, or suggesting plausible reasons your arguments aren't working, is the appropriate response?
It's as though you ignored my response to that post containing the excerpts. Oh wait, you decided my response wasn't a counterpoint when you did because the text disagreed with you, and tried to re-center your argument into something I easily debunked regarding the 'taking from the weak'.
The more you try to detract from the arguments and talk about ad-hominem, the more it becomes evident you have nothing more to say argument-wise, especially considering how you refuse to acknowledge the rest of my points.
>>28059352It's good that you mention power, money, and appearances because those things expose what Lysandre is concerned about instead of the actual giving element. Being the champion helps to highlight she's another shiny gem he wants to collect, especially since she had zero characterization outside of being dubbed a celebrity actress and the champion.
