>>28076444>Having a distinct separation named after colors that isn't actually representative of the game's color doesn't make senseYou seemed to ignore this part.
>The quotation marks are there for a reason you idiot. In other words it's not a literal representation of the color but which ever game has top billing.The reason why they're called Red and Blues is because Red and Blue started the precedent in the west.
Once again, not a literal representation of the color. I have to stress that since it seems you're not getting it.
>"Warm and Cool", however, has not only been around for much longer, it's also a much more clear distinction. Of course it's been around longer in the color theory sense but it's only been recently that people have started to refer to the versions as "warm" and "cold". Which makes less sense since as this anon says
>>28076439 it doesn't take into account several games such as Silver and by extention Soul Silver, Black, White or the third games and has to take in actual events from the games to come to a classification. "Red and Blue" is a simpler way of placing it into a category any way you look at it.
>Your interpretatio makes more sense if you referred to the games as "first and second" versions, which is actually used quite often More often than not it's used in tangent with "Red and Blue" in the same way people here have been using "Warm and cool" to determine what versions people prefer and what not.
