/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #28111514

[30 / 15 / ?]

18KiB, 269x211, image.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:38:42 No.28111514 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>28111539 >>28111562 >>28111599 >>28111612 >>28111628 >>28111901 >>28111931 >>28114246

>any pokemon with semblance of strength or masculinity is immediately dismissed as bara bait

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1472333830989.jpg, 150KiB, 758x1000

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:43:35 No.28111539 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
Problem?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:44:57 No.28111544 Report

Quoted By:

grow a pair ya big baby, just ignore it and enjoy the mon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:45:19 No.28111546 Report

Quoted By:

It doesn't just happen for Pokemon. This reminds me, I saw this Lucky Charms commercial, and they seem to have adapted to the "Adventure Time" style, with long noodle arms and legs for the lepercaun..

See? Not everyone like big, muscular men for mates.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1472293408093.jpg, 53KiB, 500x500

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:46:28 No.28111552 Report

Quoted By: >>28111560

>/vp/ fetishizing any pokemon with a remotely feminine design
>/vp/ gets mad at anybody doing the same for masculine pokemon

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Popplio shrug.png, 603KiB, 733x537

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:47:57 No.28111559 Report

Quoted By:

Eh don't let it get to you. I like litten 3 too
Lord if these things are fake...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO imgcache0.5557958.jpg, 32KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:47:59 No.28111560 Report

Quoted By: >>28111904

>>28111552
Like this,OP?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Beyond saving.png, 87KiB, 945x768

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:48:16 No.28111562 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
>any pokemon with semblance of beauty or femininity is immediately dismissed as waifu bait

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.png, 57KiB, 300x235

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:54:09 No.28111599 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
>Any Pokemon with a resemblance to an animal is immediately dismissed as furbait

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:55:27 No.28111612 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
Blame the human psyche.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 11:58:01 No.28111628 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
>any pokemon with semblance of details is immediately dismissed as overdesigned

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 34KiB, 480x360

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:28:21 No.28111901 Report

Quoted By: >>28111925

>>28111514
>semblance of strength and masculinity
That's a very broad term, as even pic-related could qualify for that, and it is clearly not barabait.

I think the category of Pokemon dismissed as bara mostly consists of mons that are
>bulky
>bipedal
>possess human features and/or toned muscles
Like Conkelldur, Litten3, and even MegaSwampert.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:28:35 No.28111904 Report

Quoted By: >>28111918

>>28111560
Yes. And they think it's a valid complaint when shit like bewear, who is meant to be cute, or mudsdale--a fucking horse, can be made bara like pic related no atter how far they are from being muscular

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:30:01 No.28111918 Report

Quoted By: >>28111974

>>28111904
Is that pic genuine bara-art or just satire?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:30:37 No.28111925 Report

Quoted By: >>28111974 >>28112006

>>28111901
Have you seen mudsdale? It's quadrupedal and yet

Garchomp is lanky and yet

Conkeldurr fits what you said but does he have bara corruption?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:31:16 No.28111931 Report

Quoted By: >>28111957

>>28111514
>listen to the """fandom""" ever
Just like whatever pokemon you want, bro. The internet will fetishize anything.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:33:52 No.28111957 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111931
This is directed more to the dteractors, actually

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO snipershrug.png, 192KiB, 800x459

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:35:24 No.28111971 Report

Quoted By:

Can't we just hate any renditions that make any Pokémon more sexualized than they are?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1468938177165.jpg, 258KiB, 848x1200

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:35:49 No.28111974 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111918
Yes it is,by a da artist called Zephleit.He likes bara and shit like that.
>>28111925
>

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1472081734509.png, 93KiB, 534x537

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:37:52 No.28111995 Report

Quoted By: >>28112037 >>28112684

>any Pokemon that isn't a waifufag happy go lucky cutesy Pokemon is immediately dismissed as edgy

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 83KiB, 750x1084

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:38:54 No.28112006 Report

Quoted By: >>28112062

>>28111925
Being a masculine looking horse gave Mudsdale automatic porn treatment.

I always thought Garchomp got more vore focus than bara. Plus, like Arcanine, even though it gets porn, it clearly doesn't look designed for it.

And pic related

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 39KiB, 530x510

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:42:18 No.28112037 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111995
There's always the grey area of bro Pokemon, that are both badass and somewhat cute

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:45:46 No.28112062 Report

Quoted By: >>28112097

>>28112006
Well that isn't quarter bad as most bara pics posted here. Conkeldurr is still significantly relatively untouched despite """qualifying"""", especially against Mudsdale--new and quadrupedal.

My point is simple, dismissing a design based on fetishizing of other people is not a valid argument against its design. I hate it when people do that

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:49:12 No.28112097 Report

Quoted By:

>>28112062
Some Pokemon just have more appeal,ie mudsdale,even if others were "meant" for bara,
conkeldurr.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO hey big guy (hey little guy).png, 28KiB, 220x232

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 12:59:12 No.28112208 Report

Quoted By:

I can't speak for everyone, but my issue personally isn't the concept so much as the execution & sometimes clumsy design..

Litten3's legs look barely functional in comparison to the rest of it's body; i'm waiting for official art to make a final judgment, but I feel like it might topple over at any moment. I don't mind that it's bipedal (even if I would've preferred a quadruped) but I do mind that it seems so weirdly topheavy.

Chestnaught's another one where I actually actually don't mind the core concept, but what gets me are those fucking tube legs - they work on something like Hitmonslinky, but Chestnaught might've benefited from a bit of plating on his shins, similar to what's on his arms. Then they could leave the upper leg as is, keeping with the whole idea of it protecting its underside.

My only problem with Emboar is its head and its typing.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1454706921154.jpg, 22KiB, 636x398

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 13:53:10 No.28112684 Report

Quoted By: >>28112819

>>28111995
>wow you like [dark type mon], anon? Haha you sure are edgy
Does edgy even mean anything anymore?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 14:06:05 No.28112819 Report

Quoted By:

>>28112684
It never meant anything, so I guess not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 14:11:20 No.28112880 Report

Quoted By: >>28112912

>A Pokémon doesn't have artificial femininity and just looks animal like and neutral, so it "looks Male"

Also known as "Male is the default gender"

I'm talking specifically about "Popplio is not feminine, how can it evolve into Mermaid hurrdurr" just because it doesnt have boobs and eyelashes it's "not feminine"? Fuck off
Also people that have set genders they want Pokémon to be based on their appearance (like Blastoise needs to be Male, Lapras needs to be female) sicken me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 14:14:40 No.28112912 Report

Quoted By:

>>28112880
i think you got the wrong website buddy
>>>/Tumblr/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 28 Aug 2016 15:44:42 No.28114246 Report

Quoted By:

>>28111514
Yes, and?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches