>>28154911because 99.99% of the time, "skepticism" is just an excuse denialfags use.
>what if it's a rejected design of a fired employee that leaked it because they're angry>what if the leaker made them but put mallow in it to throw everyone off>luchalitten's fingers are too fat and cartoony, it can't be real>the owl isn't bulky enough. rowlet was shown to be bulky but this evo is too skinny>it makes no sense for an acrobat seal to evolve into a siren>furfagfurfagfurfagfurfagfurfagfurfag>there were left over typing found hidden in the japanese site coding. we know the typings already.most of it is just reaching and the rest can be debunked with reason, but none of yall want to hear that. so sure, go ahead and be skeptical.
