/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #28202636

[80 / 5 / ?]

2MiB, 1800x3900, ZVQ9kUz[1].jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 19:48:22 No.28202636 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>28203681 >>28203815 >>28203885

Has this been updated yet?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:17:19 No.28203163 Report

Quoted By: >>28203384 >>28203426 >>28203450 >>28203453 >>28203458 >>28203654 >>28203815 >>28203960 >>28204004 >>28206422

No, but I'm the one who has been making and updating these and have the .psd. What should I change or add in your opinion?

I personally consider leak 3 completely baseless and 4 debunked (because of Arcanine on the JP site), but I'm not going to put my personal biases into it. Rattata's typing was also incorrect in the same way Ninetales was incorrect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:29:28 No.28203384 Report

Quoted By: >>28203613 >>28203789

>>28203163
I'd wait til after Rockruff's evo(s) are revealed in CoroCoro before writing off the third leak.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:31:49 No.28203426 Report

Quoted By: >>28203526

>>28203163

4 has been partially right/wrong (Alolan Ninetales being Ice/Fairy instead of Fire/Fairy, and Alolan Rattata being Dark/Normal instead of pure Dark)

I wouldn't write it off entirely

The only leak I'd really write off right now is the split evos leak.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:33:14 No.28203450 Report

Quoted By: >>28203526 >>28203613 >>28203789

>>28203163
Have you not been paying attention all day since the "Dark type" Alolan Rattata was revealed?

Leaks cannot be discredited because even if it has incorrect information that was the leakers master plan to not get caught.

Lies don't matter and half correct info is 100% legit

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:33:18 No.28203453 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203163
I've seen multiple updated versions of OP's pic that forgot to mention that "overlord" pokemon are confirmed. Just make sure to remember it when you update it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:33:32 No.28203458 Report

Quoted By: >>28203564 >>28203576

>>28203163
but it does get Rattata right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:34:08 No.28203469 Report

Quoted By: >>28203506 >>28203582 >>28203611 >>28203707

The third one has nothing to prove it.

Fourth one has Bewear name, which is no little task. I personally believe that it was told some stuff and misinterpreted (Like Fire type Ninetails and no Normal on Rattata).

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:35:53 No.28203506 Report

Quoted By: >>28203543

>>28203469
It's there to show that split evos are not mentioned by the other leaks, not because it got anything right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:36:46 No.28203526 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203426
>>28203450
Don't forget Oricorio. 3 is most likely bullshit but 4 is not yet discredited.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:37:46 No.28203543 Report

Quoted By: >>28203613

>>28203506
correct. And until we find out what the deal is with rockruff, which will be soon, I say keep the third leak until it gets BTFO officially by coroCoro.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:38:29 No.28203564 Report

Quoted By: >>28203761 >>28206422

>>28203458
No it doesn't

Would you have accepted a leak that said it was now Dark/Fire?

It's mentioned Dark type so that makes it correct, the Normal typing does't matter so why should the Fire?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:39:10 No.28203576 Report

Quoted By: >>28203648

>>28203458
Rattata is Normal/Dark

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:39:37 No.28203582 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203469
>Fourth one has Bewear name, which is no little task.

Congrats on your dyslexia.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:41:11 No.28203611 Report

Quoted By: >>28203661

>>28203469
Is the beware one actually real? The question covers the time of "answer" and the "answer" mentions that he won't say the exact name..... yet he had mentioned the exact name

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:41:25 No.28203613 Report

Quoted By: >>28203778

>>28203450
I don't know if you're being funny or not but I do not think leaks that have falsified information should be considered credible. But either way, like I said I'm trying to keep it objective, so maybe I should just split those into listing Ninetales and Rattata as correct but their typing as incorrect as that would do both sides the most justice.

I will list Arcanine as deconfirmed, though, on the same basis that gyms are deconfirmed (neither have been explicitly deconfirmed by word of GameFreak but everything points towards that being the case).

>>28203384
>>28203543
I agree, next CoroCoro will make or break it, so I'll leave it for now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:42:50 No.28203648 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203576
You are wrong os dark/normal

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:42:59 No.28203654 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203163
Considering last gen we got Fairy type's chart wrong, I wouldn't write #4 off yet. We admittedly need something more consistent though, leak #4 seems weak.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:43:10 No.28203661 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203611
If it's of any use to you, one poster in the original thread thought it was Bearware, which might have been what the leaker was going for if it was fake.
http://archived.moe/vp/thread/27172920/#27175262

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:44:24 No.28203681 Report

Quoted By:

>>28202636
>Yungoos' evolution is fat and hairy
>Things that it got right
Is it some subtle shitting on Trump? I wouldn't describe Gumshoos as fat or hairy. That shit is at most "kinda right".

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:45:32 No.28203707 Report

Quoted By: >>28203816 >>28203853 >>28203862

>>28203469
if he had actually played the game, he wouldn't have used mikyu's japanese spelling.

Bewear was a lucky guess, i'll give him that, but to be fair, he didn't actually say it's whole name.

Another lucky guess is with the birds, anyone who knows anything about darwin could have made up that rumor based on real life stuff

He's already gotten three alolan formes wrong and it's likely water arcanine isn't happening either

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:48:04 No.28203761 Report

Quoted By: >>28203862

>>28203564
no, because it never had the fire type. I was already normal type to begin with.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:49:01 No.28203778 Report

Quoted By: >>28204337

>>28203613
All day people have been saying "It's deliberately false info so the leaker can't be traced"

I don't know how that makes any sense but I've seen it parroted in various forms

so anything you mark as kinda right or wrong was just a ruse to throw people off apparently and can't be used to de bunk the rest of the information

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:49:25 No.28203789 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203450
>Have you not been paying attention all day since the "Dark type" Alolan Rattata was revealed?

Have you not been paying attention? Everyone has been guessing dark Rat ... no one said shit about dark-normal.

Show me breed cat and I'll bite.
>>28203384
That doesn't fully work.

He was vague about Ruff, only saying it had more than one evol and ones a werewolf.
1- Werewolf is a easy guess.
2- the only leak batting 100 already said werewolf ... and ONLY said werewolf.

People who want to believe leak 4 will just say it's part right like they're doing now or that the other evols will be revealed later or some shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO leaks.jpg, 2MiB, 1800x4100

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:50:34 No.28203815 Report

Quoted By: >>28203913 >>28203981 >>28204002 >>28204130

>>28202636
Here.
>>28203163
At this point only the first two leaks should be there. Maybe add the Riddler leak?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 88KiB, 640x803

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:50:36 No.28203816 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203707
>caring about an extra k which is probably to relate to a previously known concept
>both predicting Bewear's name and Oricorio was being lucky
>dismissing Alolan Arcanine for some arbitrary reason, with no hint of it otherwise
It's way too much coincidence, don't you think? The Bewear matter alone is already too much of a coincidence. Maybe the people who work on these games aren't as much of a sperg as (you)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:52:15 No.28203853 Report

Quoted By: >>28203996

>>28203707
>Darwin
>Hawaii

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:52:37 No.28203862 Report

Quoted By: >>28203909

>>28203761
So the Growlithe is going to be water/fire?

>>28203707
I wan't to know why he never mentioned the birds types if he knew all the other Pokemon types - ignoring the fact that the ones we know have been incorrect

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:53:53 No.28203885 Report

Quoted By:

>>28202636
Before updating anything just wait for next tuesday when we get more info

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:54:46 No.28203909 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203862
My guess is that some leakers just don't pay too much attention to what they actually see during development. Depending on the area they are working on, they have access to certain information and might interpret or remember things incorrectly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:54:59 No.28203913 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203815
add Alolan Rattata to the fourth one's yellow section

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:56:45 No.28203960 Report

Quoted By: >>28206493

>>28203163
But the 3rd and 4th ones both mention the Normal/Various cat. And #3 is earlier so they couldn't have copied it from #4. Is there an earlier mention of the cat?

The way #4 talk about "compromising my source" it sounds more like he knows someone who works for Game Freak and they told him a few details down the pub, which then got muddled (hence the slightly incorrect types).

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:56:46 No.28203961 Report

Quoted By:

I'm gonna wait it out to see if the last leak is wrong or not. If the leakers source told him rattata is dark and ninetales fairy, he could've assumed rattata becomes pure dark because let's face it, there really aren't that many x/normal types to begin with.

A-Meowth lost normal typing and became pure Dark. Same with Ninetales. Could've assumed by Fairy he meant it stayed fire and became fire/fairy. We don't know to what extent they knew information (whether it be bits and pieces or not).

Personally I'll wait till next corocoro and see if any new forms discredit it more or not.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:57:41 No.28203981 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203815
>Maybe add the Riddler leak?
Don't add riddler.

Not cause he's fake.
Because you can't tell shit from his riddles until after the fact because of how they're done.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:58:29 No.28203996 Report

Quoted By: >>28204192

>>28203853
>what are darwin's finches
not hawaii, but it's the same concept

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:58:46 No.28204002 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203815
I think the part about logo diamonds transforming Pokemon will be shown to be true soon since in another translation done by Cressilia it mentioned that some unique ones (Unique as in Pokemon based like megas as opposed to the generic type based ones shown before) will be able to transform Pokemon (which I how I think box legends special forms work).

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 20:58:55 No.28204004 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203163
Also, the point of the image was to make clear which leak is which, so it's useful to have #3 for when people say "the Chinese leak said we'd get split evos".

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:02:40 No.28204092 Report

Quoted By: >>28204160 >>28204316

The Gen 6 leaks also had Chespin and Froakie's final evo types mixed up, and said that Meowstis evolved into Espurr.

Aside from those two little mix-ups, everything was correct. Leak 4 shouldn't be discounted. There's a precedent for leakers getting some details wrong, or intentionally mixing false information in with correct information in order to avoid getting caught.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO four leaks sep 1.jpg, 2MiB, 1800x4300

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:04:43 No.28204126 Report

Quoted By: >>28204177

Alright, this one is updated to reflect the recent reveals:
- Changed chink leak's "logo diamonds" from kinda right to right because it's not technically incorrect (still denotes that transformation is uncertain).
- Split the typings and species of alolan form predictions into two - ninetales and rattata are correct in their species, but incorrect in their typings
- Arcanine was incorrect

Anything I missed or should change quick before I go to bed (yuropoor)?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:04:50 No.28204130 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203815
Apparently leakfags think #2 confirmed Alolan Rattata

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:06:26 No.28204160 Report

Quoted By: >>28204316

>>28204092
How does making up lies stop them from getting caught??

"Oh we only told Jimmy that Chansey is now poison type but this leak also mentioned that your starting home transforms into a mecha to fight the giant Dragonite from the anime, so it must not be him who leaked Chansey"

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:07:12 No.28204177 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204126
i would say just get rid of #3 all together, but if you want to wait until it gets BTFO by corocoro, i guess that's alright too

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO four leaks sep 1.jpg, 2MiB, 1800x4300

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:07:36 No.28204190 Report

Quoted By: >>28204256 >>28204330

Whoops, accidentally uploaded one with a typo in it.

Alright, this one is updated to reflect the recent reveals:
- Changed chink leak's "logo diamonds" from kinda right to right because it's not technically incorrect (still denotes that transformation is uncertain).
- Split the typings and species of alolan form predictions into two - ninetales and rattata are correct in their species, but incorrect in their typings
- Arcanine was incorrect

Anything I missed or should change quick before I go to bed (yuropoor)?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:07:44 No.28204192 Report

Quoted By: >>28204234 >>28204258 >>28204266

>>28203996
>darwin's finches
I know about them. Do /you/?
Cause no one would relate Darwin to Hawaii.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:09:41 No.28204234 Report

Quoted By: >>28204304

>>28204192
they're the same species of birds that have evolved to live on different islands

how is that not close enough, you're only hung up on the hawaii part, but it's still the same concept. Hell, even in that leak if mentions Darwin as the inspiration

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:10:46 No.28204256 Report

Quoted By: >>28204324 >>28204355 >>28204367

>>28204190
How about you put both Ninetales and Rattata's typing in kinda right?
The typings themselves are half right, and he also predicted two pokemon that would get Alola forms.
Also I'm not sure you can say Arcanine was incorrect just yet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:10:56 No.28204258 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204192
Different person here, but i'm lost by what you are getting at?

Darwin isn't Hawaii but Hawaii are islands which could have different kinds of the same bird like the finches

Hawaii isn't Australia but it's getting a Koala

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:11:09 No.28204266 Report

Quoted By: >>28204325

>>28204192
People can relate them to a region separated into tiny islands just like Galapagos, though, especially islands in a game where evolution plays a central role.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:12:39 No.28204304 Report

Quoted By: >>28204447

>>28204234
I know it's the fucking same concept you dense idiot.
That's why I don't believe it was a coincidence.
If you were to make up false info about a Hawaiian region, Darwin would not be an inspiration for such false info.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:13:11 No.28204316 Report

Quoted By: >>28204405

>>28204092
>>28204160

Thing is, didn't that blow up in their face?'
I remember the gen 6 leakers getting found out and dealt with.

This time China has the spot light cause by the nature of things they don't give a fuck and can get away with it. That's why the china-man leaks are the only solid ones.

The whole "partly get things wrong on propose" thing doesn't work. Anyone who followed the gen 6 leaks would know that. And if you can post without getting seen by Nintendo ninjas there's no point in getting shit half right and half wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:13:38 No.28204324 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204256
Someone pointed out the jap website's section that includes Arcanine suggests that it exists "as is" in Alola

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:13:41 No.28204325 Report

Quoted By: >>28204363 >>28204388

>>28204266
>pokemon evolution
>working like real evolution
>at all

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:14:02 No.28204330 Report

Quoted By: >>28204545

>>28204190
Why doesn't the US site have anything on the Pokemon that aren't receiving new forms according to the Japanese site? Why is that info only on the Japanese site?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:14:22 No.28204337 Report

Quoted By: >>28204496 >>28204569

>>28203778
Leaks for XY, like for Meowstic, had fake information with it so it buried the real information, or otherwise could be written off as a 'lucky guess'.
I'm not sure if it actually helps the leaker but it's not a new thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:15:38 No.28204355 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204256
Kinda right is for things that are subjective and debatable, wrong is for things that are objectively incorrect. Gumshoos being fat and hairy is subjective, it can't be quantified and only discussed. Ice/Fairy not being equal to Fire/Fairy is objective.

Like I said I already split the list of Pokemon into species and typing, which means that Ninetales moved from being 100% incorrect in the past versions of the sheet to 50% correct and 50% incorrect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:15:57 No.28204363 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204325
That's the case with Oricorio and the Alolan forms, though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:16:13 No.28204367 Report

Quoted By: >>28204481

>>28204256
Dark/Normal is still Dark

We gonna have to do a "lel, leak was wrong because X is a dual type instead of a pure type!" if this happens again?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:17:57 No.28204388 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204325
Even if pokemon evolution is a bunch of bullshit it still draws from real life evolution from time to time, like Wooper --> Quagsire being based on axolotls evolving into salamanders under special conditions
http://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species:_Wooper

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:19:07 No.28204405 Report

Quoted By: >>28204824

>>28204316
When did the leakers get 'dealt with'? I don't recall this at all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:21:24 No.28204447 Report

Quoted By: >>28204614

>>28204304
What i'm saying is that if you saw a region that consisted of various islands, it wouldn't be hard to think "oh yeah there was a bird in real life that changed on different islands" and then put in your "leaks"

he didn't even mention their types, despite mentioning the types of just about everything else

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:23:23 No.28204481 Report

Quoted By: >>28204529

>>28204367
>50% means confirmed

go pay 50% the price of a tv and see if they let you walk out of the store with because "eh, it's close enough"

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:24:16 No.28204496 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204337
I don't think the XY leaks were sprinkled with fake information to cover the leaker's tracks or whatever people are running with, I think it was based on misinformation, misremembering and incomplete information on the leaker's part. I think the only thing he mentioned that was blatantly false was that the professor was called Patrice and that there was "another professor called Sycamore".

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:26:31 No.28204529 Report

Quoted By: >>28204555 >>28204634

>>28204481
So you're saying that, hypothetically, if the next reveal is Alola Abra, and its Psychic/Fighting instead of pure Fighting, you would still consider the leak wrong?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:27:28 No.28204545 Report

Quoted By: >>28204607

>>28204330
I think the better question is, why is it on the jap site at all? Like why would you explicitly say "sorry your favourite Pokemon isn't getting an Alolan Form", instead of leaving some mystery?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:27:59 No.28204555 Report

Quoted By: >>28204620 >>28204627

>>28204529
Yes

Because it's wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:28:29 No.28204569 Report

Quoted By: >>28204670

>>28204337
None of that incorrect info was intentional you idiot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:29:45 No.28204607 Report

Quoted By: >>28204672

>>28204545
It's not there to debunk information, it's there for two main reasons: to show off new dex entries and to confirm to people what old pokemon can be found in the games, so that people who aren't watching every video and autistically taking notes of all pokemon that show up can get a quick but incomplete overview of old pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:30:18 No.28204614 Report

Quoted By: >>28204658

>>28204447
That's a lucky coincidence then, I feel it shouldn't just be written off either. It's possible he just forgot what types they are. It's lot to remember.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:30:37 No.28204620 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204555
But that's dumb. There's no way you can write off the information posted as lucky guesses, clearly he had some inside info, even if it wasn't 100% correct.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:30:49 No.28204627 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204555
Despite those digits, you are retarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:31:07 No.28204634 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204529
I would consider that particular bulletpoint half wrong and half correct, which would mean it doesn't sway the leak one way or the other and I would still consider it dubious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:32:57 No.28204658 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204614
I don't think people are using it to prove that the leak is wrong, people are just backtracing it to get a somewhat rational explanation of how the leaker came up with the idea IF the leak ends up being make-belief.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:33:35 No.28204670 Report

Quoted By: >>28204807

>>28204569
Wasn't there the smoke break guy who had the game and claimed there was a new evo for Combee? Or was that someone else?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:33:36 No.28204672 Report

Quoted By: >>28204811

>>28204607
>to show off new dex entries
Huh? They're not new.

>confirm to people what old pokemon can be found in the games
But pretty much every video already confirms that. If you want a "quick but incomplete overview" you've already had it after seeing maybe 3 clips.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:39:56 No.28204807 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204670
That's a different thing entirely. We're talking about the Pokebeach leaks that came out a few months before release.

The 'smoke break guy' (Josh I think?) got the actual game a week before release and posted endless photos so was clearly not fake. Him making stuff up would serve no purpose whatsoever (besides trolling, maybe).

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:40:03 No.28204811 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204672
>Huh? They're not new.
I didn't look all of them up but both Gyarados' and Arcanine's dex entries are new when compared to old Japanese entries.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 21:40:32 No.28204824 Report

Quoted By: >>28205555

>>28204405
IIRC it was a game of 2/3 people telephone.

1 person was a beta tester or some shit, they would tell their room mate shit (person 2) and that person would share info with some other person who would take it to pokemon fan sites or some shit.

Their drama got found out when Nintendo started taking some kinda legal action. Then they fell off the face of the earth cause no one gives a fuck about what happens to leakers after the games are released.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 22:24:51 No.28205555 Report

Quoted By:

>>28204824
Was this during XY? I swear this was way back, during BW.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 23:12:55 No.28206422 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203163
>>28203564
Because Dark/Fire would be plain wrong.
Dark is correct but not fully. Rattata is a dark type, but also Normal.
Not to mention there's no guarantee the post with alola forms was made by the op of "real leaks".

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 01 Sep 2016 23:15:47 No.28206493 Report

Quoted By:

>>28203960
I can definitely see this happening while friends from different teams talk at lunch
>did you know? Alolan Ninetales has Fairy as second type
>oh, and Rattata became Dark

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches