>>28290473There is not a concise definition of what "intersex" even means. Chromosomal? Phenotypical? Hormonal? It's too vast. Tranny activists like to parrot "muh intersex" because it diverts attention away from the fact that they are, in fact, men (for "transwomen") or women (for "transmen").
And no, there are no records of somebody being born with fully-functional gonads from both sexes if that's what you mean.
>>28290510Sex is a material, readily apparent (all the way down to your chromosomes), innate and permanent reality. "I identify as a man/woman" won't cut it and neither is getting breast implants/double mastectomy and creating a surgical wound that needs to be constantly dilated or else it will collapse/a tube of flesh extracted from your forearm and sewn to your crotch.
>>28290554No, they're not. You can't expect, say, a heterosexual or gay person to be attracted to a vagina or penis, no matter how much you try to enforce social conditioning.
>>28290610All of those cultures have been wildly misrepresented for shocking headlines. Human sexual behaviour was highly regulated and relegated to very specific situations and acts. If anything, we are much more open and free today.
