>>28807629>any opinion you have is an opinionNo shit you fucking mong. What I said is that it's not an opinion, it's a fact.
Not everything said about a design is an opinion. It's not an opinion to say it has black-tipped ears, it's a fact. It's not an opinion that it's based on Pikachu. It's not an opinion that
>>28807182>It's just another lazy pikaclone, in a gen that already has one. The actual 'Pokemon' is just a fucking cone with two dotted eyes on it. So it's not an opinion that it's lazy.
>>28807640You can simplify any Pokemon's design in those terms. But the fact remains that they are more unique and original than a copy paste of another creature within that series.
>>28807649You don't think Pikachu with another type is more interesting than Machamp? Because that's exactly what you said.
I don't defend any pikaclones, but I'm attacking this one because people give it a free pass for no good reason.
>Mimikyu is not at all just a Pikachu with a different type.Are you fucking blind?
>>28807650>And then you conceded that it's no more lazy than some Gen I designsNo I didn't you retarded faggot. I said some gen 1 designs have the same problem of nonsensical universal features, but their designs are still more unique overall because they're not a fucking literal clone of another Pokemon.
