>>28838720I wasn't implying anything of that sort but rather, something he'd allude, but might look or translate differently to all of us while he has something entirely different to show and tell that he knows he's presenting as such.
In a way, he wouldn't be lying, but rather, implying something a whole different way.
kinda like some guy giving you a giant mystery box and alluding to a Ferrari, but then you open it and it turns out it's a Ferrari
a toy Ferrari
that's a shit way of putting it, but yeah, he technically wouldn't be lying, but it's still somewhat far from the truth
