>>28946229It's almost as if different aesthetics are used for different generations of people based on the technology and trends of that age with respect to the target audience of a product. Crazy, I know.
They're both designed with the same sort of philosophy, they're just rendered in era-appropriate stylisation.
Also, what
>>28946282 said because making a bait thread, OP, about your inability to analyse surface level concepts from a property built around monsters made to illustrate world culture through surface level concepts is just sad.