[60 / 10 / ?]
Comparée to other Gamefreak concept art, they do not fit.
The formatting is wrong in That they do not have any diagrams and not Nearly Enough notes. Think engineer's notebook sketches and the level of description That has got to go into it.
The art is .. wrong. Look at all the work and simplistic Lack of detail in LITTEN's Rowlett's hands and legs and feet.
Gamefreak doesnt use placeholder names like "Tiger3, Owl3, Seal3". All concept art has the name.
People are the reason we are proposing Ash and Pikachu are there is Because it's for the anime, would, however, if it was for the anime, the Pokemon Already would have to be completed for the game and have a finalizes name. Sometimes, people hair doodle random characters in the art as well. Red was in the Concept art form the first trailer
I'm not saying they ARE definitely fake. They May Even come from GF. But it is unlikely That These are real.
The formatting is wrong in That they do not have any diagrams and not Nearly Enough notes. Think engineer's notebook sketches and the level of description That has got to go into it.
The art is .. wrong. Look at all the work and simplistic Lack of detail in LITTEN's Rowlett's hands and legs and feet.
Gamefreak doesnt use placeholder names like "Tiger3, Owl3, Seal3". All concept art has the name.
People are the reason we are proposing Ash and Pikachu are there is Because it's for the anime, would, however, if it was for the anime, the Pokemon Already would have to be completed for the game and have a finalizes name. Sometimes, people hair doodle random characters in the art as well. Red was in the Concept art form the first trailer
I'm not saying they ARE definitely fake. They May Even come from GF. But it is unlikely That These are real.
