>>28965214Good quality (mostly), lacking in content. Not awful games, but certainly not what everyone was expecting.
>>28965240And even with the comparisons we can make now, we have some unknown elements - snap minigame, online features, customisation depth/variety, location sizes, cutscenes, etc etc. We could easily end up with less "content" than X/Y or ORAS, but just have more side stuff (snap and online) and better overall quality.
It's a good sign but not a home run until we know more.
