>>29105965Not him, but that just means the games werent very well designed toward their premise.
Gen 2 fixed that.
>>29105986>You stated the goal was to catch them all like tajiri did irl for animals which is impossible.>what is readingI said it was inspired by that, not that it was literally that. Or else, the game would be called "bugs" instead of pokemon.
>Yet you think WE have to catch them all.Yes, they even give you a pokedex and an in-game prize for doing so. Not to mention is the very premise the franchise spins around.
> knowing not everyone got the event pokemons and even lost them nor live in a place which has them.So? They are obtainable. That just means they're being dicks that lock people on the Third world(like me, and I still got them all) to enjoy the game fully, but not that that's not the goal. Not to mention they are sharing all events in literally the current year.
>You think every spinda or shiny can be obtainable.You dont need those for full dex completion.
And most of those are obtainable.
>What is shiny locked?Means they locked the shiny. Which doesnt really go against what I said at all. Shiny locked legendaries are modeled to prevent hacks from breaking the game. The actual mon is still available for dex completion.
>You think parents who buy kids games and systems buy all games and transfer them out?It happens anon, not to mention they add old legends in the new games.
> You think cosplay Pikachu can be in Sm or get spikey eared pichu.Why do you think people dont like those?
>You think when it becomes 1000 or 2000 we could still get them all.I have 721. 279 more doesnt seem to be a big deal. As for 2000, we'll see if we eventually get there.
That said, they havent deleted mons, which, if they hate quantity so much and dont expect you to have all at all, should have already done.
