> GF makes a Pokémon
> It's not cute or badass
> "IT'S A BAD DESIGN BECAUSE IT'S UGLY"
> Now, "le execution" meme, implying always those Pokémon are bad because it's ugly

This bothers me. Many Pokémon are based on ugly things or in origins that it's impossible to make a non-ugly Pokémon. It's ridiculous to think that a Pokémon based on a pile of garbage is bad design because it's ugly. And this is an easy example, there are many Pokémon that have an ugly design for many good reasons, and that's not bad at all.

> B-but the concept ≠ execution
Yeah, that's right, but think a minute. Do you remember any non-ugly Pokémon who you think that has a BAD execution? Now think again, if it's impossible to relate with a cute/badass Pokémon and its origin, is it well-designed because is not ugly? or it's bad design because that design doesn't makes sense?

Yeah, the execution is important, but not the perspective who many people thinks, at least in Pokémon. Alolan Muk is a proof of this: if Game Freak thought that an ugly Pokémon is bad design, GF had never created this Pokémon.

Just enjoy Pokémon.