>>29182296You missing the point =/= tangent
Again with the imaginary conversations. Did Joe tweet "this is a 100% real fact this is fake"? If he did I'll drop this now
I'm starting to understand your point though, you think I'm trying to say no one was wrong because of "opinions". You've completely missed my point again and decided for whatever reason that saying obviously completely changes everything
Joe was wrong, simple as that. But you people aren't content with that, it is somehow bad that he said something that could be wrong in the first place. My point is that in everyday language we use non-neutral language without it meaning it's absolute, people shouldn't be forced to never give a simple yes or no just because it triggers you.
I'm not making out that being an opinion means he wasn't wrong, but theres nothing wrong with an opinion
If pokemon is somehow an isolated phenomenon that can't be compared with anything else than let me purely use pokemon. I'm gonna say right now that the weed smoking weedle pic is obviously a fake, would you deny me that?
