>>29320933Ignoring that you're totally undermining my argument by chalking it up "2d can't look like 3d so you're wrong" even though I explicitly explained the cause of that even gave the example of how things are often said to look fatter in the models, I wasn't speakign in terms of you saying it was LITERALLY a perfect sphere, because you are wrong on that count as well. The thing with a 2d drawing is, for example, in this instance, the face is drawn straight on, so you see the face's shape from the front. The problem is it's a drawing and if it weren't, its face wouldn't be directly forward, it would have more angle to it. You can see that in the 3d model, where its head is the same ovoid shape except because it's made in a modelling program, its made to look perfectly straight aligned with the body, so the head looks more spherical, but in actuality you can clearly tell the shape is basically the same kind of oval shape and not a LITERAL sphere, just perspective is making it appear smaller because as a model it's forced to work in a 3d space whereas a 2d drawing can be drawn to look however they want it to come across. It's the same principle as if you flip an image of something looking sideways perfectly perpendicular to the opposite side so that it looks like it directly facing you. It looks wider.
