>>29364606>samefaggingI am only one guy argueing in one front, unless you actually believe that I did a hundred posts in the course of 2 hours, which is almost a post per minute.
>ad hominenEither you don't know what is that, or you are talking about someone else, since all my comments only referred to the games and what surrounded them.
>You failedTo convince you maybe, because the fact that ORAS was much more welcomed than HGSS still maintains. You just can't get into your head that what you feel is good is not necessarily better. For example a harder game is not going to make a better game, they already did it in BW, and it was a huge fail(you may think otherwise, because you are relying on your feelings to say if something was good).
>Argue with semanticsI showed hard proof with numbers, but a single number is not going to say if a game is better or worse, you have to take into consideration multiple factors before saying that a game is most probably better than the other. This is why I preferred to stay with "more welcomed" at first, since I only showed number relative to sales.
>moving goalpostsFunny, because you are the one moving each one of them, I even commented it on one of my replies, instead of confronting my arguments, you are outright saying that you won and won't reply anymore. You are not even moving them anymore, you just took out the goalpost, and is refusing to put it anywhere afraid of losing.
>accept they are not good remakesAgain, I am not using my subjective feelings into consideration, so if I said that I would be lying. I did like HGSS more, but my opinion is not a fact, maybe because silver was my first game, but an anedoctal evidence is worth as much as it looks like.
I can't believe how much shit you are writing, just present some facts backed up by comparable objective numbers, and I would be glad to argue, if you are just going to write another wall of text, whatever, you win.
