/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #29440751

[71 / 9 / ?]

220KiB, 1920x1080, xy.jpg

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 18:59:35 No.29440751 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>29440847 >>29440893 >>29441862 >>29442256

>2013
>They only added 70 new pokemon in XY because of the transition to 3D!
>They will add 70 new ones in X2Y2/Z, that's obvious!
2016:
>Are you LITERALLY complaining about SM adding the same amount of pokemon as XY? Fuck off entitled cunt!!!

What happened?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:01:13 No.29440773 Report

Quoted By: >>29440798

You have to be extremely adaptive and creative with your mental gymnastics to defend a company like Gamefreak.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:03:02 No.29440798 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440773
You have to be extremely autistic and cucked with your shitposting against GaneFreak and fans that don't share your shitty opinion

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:04:19 No.29440821 Report

Quoted By: >>29440902 >>29440934

>muh 70
Megas and alola forms are part of the "new" Pokemon count whether you like it or not

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:06:08 No.29440847 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440751
>What happened?

You thinking /vp/ is one person, for a start.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:09:31 No.29440892 Report

Quoted By: >>29441609 >>29441647 >>29441819

Discounting evolutions, how many Gen IV Pokemon are there?

If you want to go even further, discount legendaries. How many are there? Compare that to Kalos/Alola.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:09:34 No.29440893 Report

Quoted By: >>29440934 >>29441398

>>29440751
>not counting megas
>not counting alola forms and ultra beasts

Fuck off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:10:26 No.29440902 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440821
This.

Creating a new 100+ 3D models require so much time, thus they are creating 70~, and doing abortions with older ones to fill the 30 slots left.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:11:22 No.29440915 Report

Quoted By: >>29440937 >>29441003 >>29441700

Quality >>>> Quantity
both gen 6 and 7 have more good than bad designs which is more than I can say for gen 5

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Mega Gardevoir.jpg, 6KiB, 184x274

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:12:15 No.29440934 Report

Quoted By: >>29441941

>>29440821
>>29440893
2013:
>Megas don't count as new pokemon! They are just variations of old pokemon!
2016:
>Variations of older pokemon count as new pokemon!

What happened?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:12:18 No.29440937 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440915
(You)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 'quality'.jpg, 187KiB, 792x838

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:16:23 No.29441003 Report

Quoted By: >>29441196 >>29441218 >>29441505 >>29441652

>>29440915
>"Quality"

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:28:48 No.29441196 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441003
>having this much of a shit taste

Opinion discarded

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:30:16 No.29441218 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441003
>Disliking Bewear

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:40:04 No.29441398 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440893
Alright then. If we count megas, alola forms and ultra beasts, then gen 6 introduced a total of 120 new Pokémon.
Sun and moon introduced a total of 104 new Pokémon, making it the smallest new generation to date.

Take that as you will.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1474477163901.gif, 848KiB, 500x281

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:46:08 No.29441505 Report

Quoted By: >>29441542 >>29442110

>>29441003
Not gonna talk about your shit taste, but about objective things.
Maybe I forgot how to count, but 13 pokemon is not even close from the half of the dex (the anon you were answering to talked about "the half", H-A-L-F, like 1/2). You are not even an autist because autists can count. Sorry m8, you can go home now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:47:59 No.29441542 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441505
(Saying the half because you basically need at least the half of good designs to have more good than bad)

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:47:59 No.29441543 Report

Quoted By: >>29441562

>people actually thought we would get more Pokemon in a later Gen VI game

lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:48:51 No.29441562 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441543
Gen 6.5 fags were truly a sight to behold

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:50:57 No.29441609 Report

Quoted By: >>29441861

>>29440892
Excluding legendaries and cross gen (pre-)evolutions, 63.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:53:30 No.29441647 Report

Quoted By: >>29441806 >>29441861 >>29442164

>>29440892
78.

Same thing with Gen 2, take away the babies and cross-generational evolutions and you have 80 new Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:54:00 No.29441652 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441003
>Popplio3
>Bewear
What? Afraid your bros at the gym will make fun of you? They know about your dildo collection, don't worry.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO viva la gen 7.png, 521KiB, 749x498

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:57:11 No.29441700 Report

Quoted By: >>29441750 >>29441929

>>29440915
Some fucking quality indeed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 19:58:59 No.29441730 Report

Quoted By: >>29444229

It just gets tiresome. This is the new standard. Get over it or fuck off.

Are you going to cry again when gen 8 only has 80 Pokemon or will you finally man up and drop the series?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:00:05 No.29441750 Report

Quoted By: >>29441911

>>29441700
>not liking Comfey
>not liking Togedemaru
>not liking Tsareena
>not liking Tapukoko
>not liking Oricorio

You're the problem. Most of the shit in your picture is fine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:02:57 No.29441806 Report

Quoted By: >>29441917 >>29441925

>>29441647
But babies and cross generation evolutions are still new Pokemon. Forms aren't. Don't be retarded.

>hurr Rotom is actually 6 pokemon and Wormadam is actually 3 pokemon guise!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:03:17 No.29441819 Report

Quoted By: >>29441874

>>29440892
Kalos had 68 new Pokemon discounting the legendaries.
Alola has 63 new Pokemon discounting legendaries and ultra beasts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:05:02 No.29441861 Report

Quoted By: >>29441895

>>29441647
>>29441609
Isn't that interesting

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:05:04 No.29441862 Report

Quoted By: >>29441892 >>29442193

>>29440751
Because it's common for odd number gen's to have less Pokemon

And modeling every Pokemon is work (even if they didn't do a great job)

Then to fucking reuse the same models and only make like 80 more is fucking bullshit

And it's no where near XY's quality of a dex

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:05:31 No.29441874 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441819
hang on, forgot the dancing birds are variations of the same Pokemon. Make it 60 for Alola instead.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:06:06 No.29441892 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441862
*even have less

Odd tends to have a lot more

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:06:13 No.29441895 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441861
The other guy excluded legendaries which are a big part of the Sinnoh dex.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:06:51 No.29441911 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441750
You forgot some of them
>Fomantis
>Minior
>Tapu Squid
>Motherfucking alolan Marowak
Even all the other are not terrible, but let's stay gentle with haters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:07:10 No.29441917 Report

Quoted By: >>29442295

>>29441806
They might count as new Pokemon in the pokedex, but are they really?

Think about why exist. To improve on older Pokemon. Yes, I agree that it is the best way to improve them, but with megas and regional forms there's no real point anymore.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:07:36 No.29441925 Report

Quoted By: >>29441965 >>29441966 >>29442246

>>29441806
Sorry but I do consider Alolan forms to be new Pokemon to some extent. There's nothing wrong with them putting a new spin on something familiar.

>new typing
>new design
>new stats
>new abilities

They're way better additions than babies ever were, anyway.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1468623966958.jpg, 50KiB, 499x361

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:07:40 No.29441929 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441700

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image_0.png, 28KiB, 507x565

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:08:28 No.29441941 Report

Quoted By:

>>29440934

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:09:41 No.29441965 Report

Quoted By: >>29442000 >>29442178

>>29441925
Their literally rotom forms

They have new types
They have new stats
The have new movepool
They have new design

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:09:47 No.29441966 Report

Quoted By: >>29441999

>>29441925
If alolan forms don't count as new Pokemon then neither do cross-gen evolutions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:11:09 No.29441999 Report

Quoted By: >>29442030 >>29442178

>>29441966
>if forms don't count as Pokemon
Then
>evolutions don't count as Pokemon

Most retarded post I've seen on /vp/ in awhile

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:11:15 No.29442000 Report

Quoted By: >>29442285 >>29442316

>>29441965
From a coding and design perspective, those are new Pokemon actually. Roughly the same amount of effort.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:12:57 No.29442030 Report

Quoted By: >>29442075

>>29441999
So Alolan Exeggutor doesn't count as a new Pokemon because it's a "form", but Happiny and Magmortar do?

Dipshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:15:02 No.29442075 Report

Quoted By: >>29442095 >>29442178

>>29442030
>literally a sub name next to it
>Alola Exeggutor
>completely different pokemon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:15:51 No.29442095 Report

Quoted By: >>29442122 >>29442168

>>29442075
Holy shit you're legitimately stupid

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:16:23 No.29442110 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441505
but that's the whole point
Quality > Quantity doesn't mean shit if most the designs are good.

Add more pokemon, and you'll consistently have more good designs that bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:17:07 No.29442122 Report

Quoted By: >>29442162

>>29442095
Is Wormadam trash cloak and Wormadam sand cloak 2 completely fucking different Pokemon?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:18:40 No.29442162 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442122
False comparisons retard. Alolan Exeggutor is as drastic as Magmortar. If one doesn't count as a 'real' pokemon than neither should.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:18:44 No.29442164 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441647
Honestly until gen 6 I always considered 4 and 2 to be the weakest generations.
I was hoping we'd get another good odd generation but that seems unlikely.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:18:53 No.29442168 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442095
It's name is still fucking Exeggutor when in battle

It's literally the same Pokemon in a different form

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO retard.jpg, 139KiB, 500x500

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:19:12 No.29442178 Report

Quoted By: >>29442199 >>29442221

>>29441965
>>29441999
>>29442075
Here anon, this should help you understand why you're being a moron.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:20:04 No.29442193 Report

Quoted By: >>29442346

>>29441862
>Because it's common for odd number gen's to have less Pokemon
>gen 5 added 156 new pokemon

you literally can't even.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:20:15 No.29442199 Report

Quoted By: >>29442239

>>29442178
Yes?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:21:17 No.29442221 Report

Quoted By: >>29442239

>>29442178
A Exeggutor counts as the top, then. Shaymin reverts.

What if everything was the same and it had been introduced as 'Lonneggutor'. Nothing else changes.

Do you see how arbitrary and stupid this is? It's a new Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:22:11 No.29442239 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442199
So regardless of whether it's called the same thing if the changes are drastic enough it is for all intents and purposes a NEW POKEMON.

Also the fact that GF always announces them as such, so they obviously consider that to be the case as well.

>>29442221
I agree, the other guy is a fucking idiot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:22:31 No.29442246 Report

Quoted By: >>29442285

>>29441925
So Wormadam is three Pokemon. Got it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:23:18 No.29442256 Report

Quoted By: >>29442288 >>29442317 >>29442358 >>29444472

>>29440751
I got out of Pokemon around Diamond and Pearl, and all my old games are lost. The new games look cool, but I'm hesitant to jump back in because I feel like I might've missed too much, and I'd feel stupid for losing all of my old Pokemon from the games I used to have. Is it still worth getting back in? Won't there be a bunch of event Pokemon that I'd never be able to get at this point? I know hacking Pokemon is bad, and they have ways to detect it, but is there any way to just copy an old event Pokemon with legit stats so that I could get an event Pokemon that I missed and not feel like I missed out on them?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:24:50 No.29442285 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442246
see
>>29442000

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:25:00 No.29442288 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442256
>and they have ways to detect it
No they don't. Unless you hack in something stupid like a Lapras that knows Flamethrower.

You can get every pokemon available between XY and ORAS, barring the event-only ones you missed.

Is it worth it?

At this point, not really.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:25:26 No.29442295 Report

Quoted By: >>29442334 >>29442338

>>29441917
That's nice. But forms still aren't Pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:26:03 No.29442316 Report

Quoted By: >>29443609

>>29442000
>Roughly the same amount of effort
making shit pokemon takes roughly the same amount of effort than making good pokemon. Your argument is retarded because it implies there's no such thing as bad pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:26:06 No.29442317 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442256
Yes, Pokemon are just data, it's not hard to manipulate them.

If you do it right a Pokemon created in Pokegen/PKHex is indistinguishable from a legitimate Poke.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:26:59 No.29442334 Report

Quoted By: >>29443105

>>29442295
Alolan Forms aren't the same thing as Wormadam's gimmick you goddamn moron.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:27:10 No.29442338 Report

Quoted By: >>29442375

>>29442295
Except the people who make the games consider them to be, so your opinion is irrelevant.

>inb4 he posts the Wormadam thing an 8th time

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:27:43 No.29442346 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442193
He literally fixed it in the post under it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:28:03 No.29442358 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442256
There's never a bad time to get back into Pokemon

Also if you really want events, you can edit your save to inject their wondercards so you can obtain them legit

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:28:45 No.29442375 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442338
But they literally call them forms

Not "more new Pokemon"

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 514.png, 60KiB, 296x325

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 20:30:34 No.29442410 Report

Quoted By:

I would say the best way to get the numbers into the 200-300 per region range is just clone the shit out of old ideas. Just make a bunch of elemental monkeys, it's not like people will give a fuck about them personally and will just buy the game when the number of new Pokemon introduced in a generation is a sign of their good quality.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 21:05:38 No.29443105 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442334
>new moveset
>new type
>new stats
>new appearance

Coulda fooled me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 21:31:27 No.29443609 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442316
That wasn't even his arguement

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 22:04:36 No.29444229 Report

Quoted By:

>>29441730
Once we get to 1,000 they won't care about the number of pokemon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Oct 2016 22:16:30 No.29444472 Report

Quoted By:

>>29442256
It's always worth it getting back into Pokemon, my friend. I understand loosing all your bros from your past games. That's tough. But every game, I make new bros. always have, always will.

Even if you can't get all the event legends (Which, through internet connections, is definitely less difficult then it used to be) They don't count towards your in game pokedex. If you get all of them, but the events, then the game considers you good. Even if you get just one event pokemon, it'll still just count your pokedex as complete.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches