>>29473152That is worst attempt at an analogy I've seen in a long time.
A thing is made to communicate an idea and every aspect is measured in order to properly convey what is meant to be conveyed. In the case of this Pokemon, every aspect properly denotes aspects of a generic heel wrestler. Therefore it is objectively good.
Please tell me how any of it doesn't communicate a heel wrestler, pleas go ahead.
The fingers? Have you never seen a wrestling slap? They look like that because his hand is shaped like a cupped hand for a wrestling slap which is a shape that makes the coolest noise. Any more complaints? You've no idea how to actually criticise anything so I'd lose to say how stupidly desperate you can get.
>>29473263Being a hypocrite is bad for you, lad. Open your eyes, maybe, and learnt hat to criticise a concept you first need to understand it.
>your opinionNo one cares about your opinion because an opinion is just a preference and isn't a topic of discussion. You're not the centre of the universe, mate. I'm dealing in observations and facts and I'm coming from an informed position. You obviously have no idea about what constitutes good/bad design, know nothing of pro wrestling and know nothign of how to form an argument and are just a babby who got upset because people like something and you don't understand it.
Maybe if you listened instead of shouting like a maniac you'd be able to understand it and figure out why there's so much praise.
Your special snowflake approach to criticism that boils down to 'my imagined conventions for blind aesthetics devoid of conceptual integrity and based completely in presumptions are more important than the actual reasons why this thing looks the way it does' is mind-blowing; don't know how a person can be so self-absorbed while having no self-awareness.
