>>29610991>Machamp was even one of the first pokemon revealedIt was like the fourth or fifth, the first being Lucario and Blaziken, then Pikachu and Charizard.
>Of course 90% of underages whine "Roster isn't all fighting types in a fighting game" every time.Don't know what your point is here but I stand by the fact that 90% of Fighting types are boring and shit. That's why you never knew anybody who liked a Fighting type as their favourite when you were a kid.
>>29611979>Machamp is what people think about when pure fighting types are concernedWell evidently fucking not since people have been talking about Hitmons since day one. They have said in interviews that they're trying to avoid a lot of Fighting types so Machamp is probably just there as the poster boy for that type so they can excuse themselves from having to put in any more just based on being that type.
>Plus it's a trade evo, which have high chances of getting in.I...what? I'm sorry, what?
I'm curious, do you have to try to be this retarded or does it just come naturally? Could you go get your mother to read the next part of this post:
Hey Anon's mother nice to see you again, just wanted to let you know that your son is being a retard and you've failed at parenting. I recommend you send him back to special needs school before he hurts himself.
