>>29652180>Anon, pay attention to the thread. Done(even if its pointless since what we´re arguing here is your interpretation of something I said, no what´s overall being discussed). When did I say that the only aspect about a mon is the design?
>If you can't comprehend this sentence then you shouldn't have replied to begin with.There´s a lore difference, yeah, I never said they have been done before in the literal sense, heck, I clarified in
>>29652101 >They aren´t the exact same of course, since they arent called Alolan Unown
Doesn´t mean it´s an entirely new concept. Specially if, as I said, there´s lore similarities with something that happened before.
>Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it.Sure bud.
