>>29680258>which is retarded since that means "not literally"No, it makes use of the definition of literally to imply that it is so similar that it is beyond doubt. Usage of literally in this sense dates back to, literally, the dawn of popular culture.
>dictionary dot comOh, wow, a colloquial Americanisation. Whatever, that doesn't constitute an argument, now you're just trying to defend yourself and still not making any arguments to support your random statements about genres.
>You didn't provide the asked exampleThat is because what you asked and your asking that shows that you misread what I had written and this example you're searching for is imagined.
If you want other genres that have produce that is also aimed at young boys then there's Sailor Moon and other 'shoujo' manga that actually cater largely to teenage boys, the likes of Macross, Welcome to the NHK, Crayon Shin Chan.
>ironically imitating me>So....shonen is a demographic?No, i t is a word literally meaning 'boys' and I already explained why and how there is a genre called 'shounen' and why it has its own tropes, you mong.
>That's literally my pointNo, it's literally the opposite of your implications
>You had to prove what they had in common and failedNo, I had to beat you in this argument and I did that before I even hit submit the firs time. You're only fooling yourself, lad.
>>29680392>This has been a major problem everytime I engage in an argumentation on 4chan, especially here on /vp/It's come to a point where I come to /vp/ expecting it. It's worse when there's a group of them spamming at you and you're outnumbered. /wooo/ has similar arseholes in Japanese wrestling threads and I wonder if it has something to do with 'weeaboos'. I know the whole 'calling drawings art' and 'artstyle' thing comes from bad fan translations and is from that community and exclusive to it.
