>>29696183>Explain yourself Sure. The dog isn't perfect either, for the record - it leaves a lot of questions about design, including the seemingly nonsensical star on its eye. I guess it's supposed to have to do with knocking people out? The transition from paws to gloves is really awkward, it would have actually been better to slap some actual gloves on it. Pants are a bit weird too.
Dust bunny is flawless.
Snake's mouth is too disturbing for Pokemon, they'd never go with that sort of design. It's not really remarkable outside of it, either. It's a boring short snake that gives me an impression of a basic enemy that you kill en masse in some sci-fi action game.
The next one is just a crazy person literally. It's a bad idea for a Pokemon and screams edgy. It's just barely a step above something like a wrist slitting Pokemon, or a murder Pokemon. If it looked sillier I might think different but the flat colors just make it seem creepy.
It's just a fucking fox with a mask.
Bird is okay. I wouldn't question it if it was a Pokemon.
It's just a fucking whale with a skull on it.
>Maybe it was made before KomalaIt almost certainly was. And it's not a bad concept. It just feels a bit lackluster. It's ultimately just a koala covered in leaves. Many grass pokemon have their grass traits incorporated into their biology. See: Sceptile's tail, Rowlet's feather-leaf-daggers.
>genericThis is a valid criticism. It's a monster game. There should be more creative designs than literally my mom's x. Sorry Stantlerfag, plain animals are boring.
