>>29916724That's not misinformation that had to be debunked, because nobody thought that to begin with. Everyone was spouting nonsense about a 20% rate because they thought surely there had to be a catch, and datamining confirmed there wasn't and the rates were the same regardless of whether it was female + male or male/genderless + Ditto. Ask SciresM or Kaphotics or any of the other dataminers, they'll tell you the same thing.
Let me guess, you're also one of the retards who thinks the DexNav has the same flat shiny rate as the Safari when in fact the shiny rate increases with the DexNav search level, right?
