>>30501959>This may be true, but i would rather fail to 2hko with the same amount of damage rather than a rng roll.At this point you're basically admitting you're a bad player. You were betting on two highrolls in a row and then complain when it failed you.
Pokémon is as you said about calculated risks, this includes damage rolls.
>no your '''explanation'' was shitNobody is complaining that it lacks more realistic elements like hunger. You were the only one bringing that up. Again, it's not hyper realistic at all, nor does it try to be. At the same time it isn't "without any fucking sense" like you claimed either.
