>>30523082Pic related from the Eurogamer article, this is from the announcement, and with the way the game runs, I don't think they did any form of optimization for poly/tri count. So this part is bullshit. Also, why would they launch a new version of the game on the switch a year later, when they haven't done a 3rd version since Platinum.
This entire article is speculation, with such a high profile game like this, leaks would be very sparse of large details like "Pokemon Bank will totally work with this guys!" Maybe their source says "Yeah, there's a mainline Pokemon game in development for the Switch/NX." but I VERY much doubt that they spilled the beans about the whole project. Of course, we'll never know the actual "sources" so until Nintendo actually confirms anything for this I'm not buying the rumors, especially when a good amount of them are so easily debunked.
>>30523166Someone is losing their job over those leaks I'd imagine.
