>>30995086>sound type"Sound" doesn't make a good concept for the defensive half of what constitutes a Pokemon Type, therefore it's only good as a type of offensive move- which it currently is.
>wind type>Gust>HurricaneLiterally Flying Type.
>wood typeIronically I like this one, but it is a weak concept. I can feel that it wants to make a distinction between "leafy, flowery" Grass type, and "roots and dense cellulose structure" Wood type.
Again, it's a weak concept because it's a pointless distinction, as all plants have both elements and therefore most Grass Types have both elements, and because Grass typing is already kind of vague and includes fungus.
>gas typeI can go along with this, but as a concept it's functionally Ghost type.
The mutual weakness with Fire is cool, but I don't think that it's fully thought out.
>abnormal typeEvery Type is "Abnormal".
