>>31056373Why do all of my gen 1 games say 1995 then? And explain how I got them IN 1996?! So, who's the stupid one here?
>>31056391Or, maybe, if you think that, and, anon, this is just a thought, so bare with me, but, maybe you should consider suicide.
>>31056405Well, I'm sorry you were that stupid anon, but most people with brains would have expected gen 3, the most beloved gen ever, to be exactly what it was.