>>31300732Except I did bring it up.
>The point isn't what exact language is used or the /pol/ content in particular, it's that the deliberate intent is to derail every fucking thread with their tired shit. Try applying that reading comprehension you learned about in school before hitting Post next time.
Talking about /pol/ specifically (or at least /pol/ topics) is almost inevitable because they're the only ones who do this shit on literally every board because it's the easiest shit to bait with. The only thing that compares is trying to start an atheist/theist argument which is technically also a /pol/ topic anyway.
>>31300760I wasn't the guy who bitched about it being racist earlier idiot.