>>31450645They got help and probably realize the issue with their attraction/fetish, that's fine, I support them 100%.
IMO as someone who dealt first hand with a pedo as a kid I'll say it's not the physical all of the time with their attraction, it's also the idea of the child itself and how mentally immature they are. The HUGE power imbalance between a grown person and a child gets them off on an equal ground as the child'a body. Men who like developed 13 year olds like them because of their naïveté and the inexperience of life. The power dynamic. If not, they'd like a developed girl of 17+, not only -16 year olds.
It's a messy subject, but even soft CP (3D) hams children, don't make excuses for it. These kids in the films are still being subject to intent of CP - and that is psychologically scarring. It does not produce a constructive member of society, in most cases. The argument of "let pedos watch soft CP, it doesn't hurt anyone," is flawed. As is the idea that it's a sexuality - it isn't, it's a fetish 100% due to the harm involved. Legal consent can never be given, they get off on the idea of the child's thought process and attitude, and undeveloped body. It harms both parties, as one is self destructive in terms of societal norms, and expectations - usually coinciding with mental illness. Obviously it hurts the child, and obviously it hurts society.
This thread is stupid, but I do believe people are trying to normalize pedophilia, though I thought they'd try to go for incest first, or even beastiality. (Not furry porn. I'm talking about zoophiles who complain about the idea of being punished for being in a "non abusive, consenting sexual relationship with an animal of appropriate size.")
Let pedos have their loli drawn shit and simulated games - but they should seek help, as their "sexuality" will do nothing but ostracize them from others, may fall into mental unrest, and hurt themselves/could harm others in the end.