>>31627054>Why don't we just let Nintendo do whatever the fuck they want? Why not let them charge $120 for each game? It would imply the games get larger budgets, doesn't it? Except what they are actually proposing is reasonable. They can charge for online and people will still pay for it because it's not a very steep cost in the slightest, and reasonable people understand those services cost money to run.
Ultimately, yes, Nintendo can do whatever they want. Most people, myself included, would stop being customers if they did something as ludicrous as you're suggesting. I don't think that even warranted a confirmation, desu.
But you seem to only want to throw a temper tantrum and add unrealistic, non-existant, senseless scenarios to attempt to make a point, so it stands to reason your base argument doesn't stand well enough on its own.
