>>31917774I just used vastly underresearched estimates because the numbers themselves aren't relevant to the point I was making.
There's nothing wrong with knowing that pokemon trivia but my issue is someone calling people retards who don't have that info on the top of their heads.
>U don't know all 15 pokemon release years? Ur dumb! Is the argument the idiots who've been (You)ing me have been operating under.
As you can see in,
>>31917825, they're trying to damage control by conflating my reasoning beyond recognition into a straw man.
>>31917844Projection isn't an argument on its own, you need to substantiate the claim with past events and facts from my life which is impossible on an anonymous image board, but it's nice to see yet another example of your idiocy.
