>>32072602I dont care about appeal and i understand that many arent the """cutest""" nor the """prettiest/most elegant""" but it irks me to no end when people gauge fighting type design and aesthetics through the filter of other types and not for their purpose of looking menacing/intimidating nor for the understanding that fighting types are supposed to be able to grapple, punch, kick, etc hence the predominantly humanoid designs
>>32073008Disgusting taste but i dont care and wont berate you further unless you think everything else is garbage
>>32073011This. Thank you
>>32074327>but I wouldn't want every Fighting type to be like that.Not my point and even then, there isn't any design that closely resembles Machamp aesthetically. Conkeldurr is reminiscent but because of other parallel aspects (evo path, stats, role, niche etc) amd not becausr of design. Hitmons and the onis are humanoids, too but are also quite different
>I do think later generations added more overall variety to the designs. Oh yeah. My point isnt that Gen 6/7 designs are inherently bad and I do like many of them. What pisses me off is people who absolutely despise everything but the new ones and then claim to be hardcore fans of the type or something like that
