>>32141265>Mods delete my postsWow, that's sad. What exactly did my post violate in pic related? Seriously, a warning? For what? For WHAT? There is no way, no WAY the mods here actually have this much bias. There are dozens of posts that outright break global rules that go by and nothing happens to them, but MY post somehow warrants a warning? In what fucking world? What rule did my post break?
For those who missed
>>32141265 I will post it again below
>>32141185Jealously isn't cute, sweetie.
>>32141194Actually it's Fire/Dark but how would someone like you know that.
>>32141203I'm trying to mimic the design philosophy of Gen 7, not Gen 1 or 3. Get over your nostalgia and look to the future, bigot. Sorry!
>>32141212Thanks anon.
WHAT RULE in pic related did I violate? Troll? I wasn't trolling, so please explain, mods. My post violated NOTHING. Get it straight.
