>>32315835>That depends if those group like these characters or not once they finish watching the movie.You do realize we're talking about bringing people in, right? It doesn't matter what people think of them afterwards. And no matter how great they may be, which they won't be since it's Pokemon, they still won't be able to get nearly as popular as older cast, simply because they don't have the time. They only have a single movie. It's not even close to being enough to make a character popular. See any movie only character if you want evidence.
>I doubt that if the movie have Brock and Misty follow Ash>I doubtReally now?
>They replace them possible as a way to make the characters and the movie interesting by adding few elements Then my original questions comes back. Why even bother with Kanto, then? Just make a new movie. You'll easily be able to add in new elements to make it interesting, and no one would complain. What is the point of setting it in Kanto and to show what happened in Kanto, but not actually showing that.
>I was mostly referring in the case of characters.And my question was why does the characters matter to you if the setting doesn't. The entire premise of this movie is to pander to older fans, and they're not even doing that right.
>Maybe, maybe not.Anon, there really is no "maybe not" here. If you actually think removing the originals has made more people happy because "fuck pandering!!!!", then you're just being a tiny bit delusional.
>Pokemon pretty much will always be gear towards children and young teens.And those are not the ones who are going to buy the tickets. Pokemon is aimed at children, but the audience is not children. I don't know if you've ever seen a Pokemon movie in theater before, but the next time you do, look around and see how many kids are there compared to teens and adults. You WILL be surprised.
>we want to make a movie about Kanto, but don't want to pander Kanto fansThis sounds just dumb. Nothing more. Dumb.
