/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #32382982

[23 / 8 / ?]

125KiB, 1400x700, Kabutops-Pokemon-Red-claws.jpg

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 22:32:49 No.32382982 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>32382988 >>32383024 >>32383044 >>32383135 >>32383161 >>32383210 >>32384597 >>32384694 >>32384741 >>32384881

Why is Kabutops so ugly?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 22:33:20 No.32382988 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
because (You) have shit taste

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 250px-123Scyther.png, 50KiB, 250x250

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 22:39:06 No.32383024 Report

Quoted By: >>32384604

>>32382982
Why is Scyther so ugly?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 22:42:06 No.32383044 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
Looks bad in that animation, but it isn't ugly in general. One of the best gen 1 Pokemon, and probably my favorite Pokemon in general, tied with Shedinja and Golisopod.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 141Kabutops_RB.png, 151KiB, 473x393

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 22:57:52 No.32383135 Report

Quoted By: >>32383250

>>32382982
I wouldn't say its ugly. In fact, I think it's beautiful in a "sinister" type of way. Unless "sinister" isn't your cup of tea.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:01:48 No.32383161 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
It looks great in gen 1 style, not so much in the later plastic cosplay animal style.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO images.jpg, 13KiB, 279x180

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:06:36 No.32383210 Report

Quoted By: >>32383219

>>32382982
Why is zapdos si ugly

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:07:29 No.32383219 Report

Quoted By:

>>32383210
Hola Pedro!

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 141Kabutops_RG.png, 477KiB, 820x804

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:11:40 No.32383250 Report

Quoted By:

>>32383135
>not posting the original

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO best fossil.jpg, 323KiB, 633x823

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:15:46 No.32383283 Report

Quoted By: >>32383297

Well it's not trying to look pretty.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 23:17:34 No.32383297 Report

Quoted By: >>32385479

>>32383283
>filename
absolutely

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:12:36 No.32384597 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
It's a prehistoric monster that devours prey in the most gruesome way possible.

It's supposed to be ugly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:14:06 No.32384604 Report

Quoted By:

>>32383024
It's a giant fucking mantis.

Brett !!TORtoOQMEfy

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tumblr_lvths2V3DY1qc3v1yo1_500.png, 249KiB, 500x354

Brett !!TORtoOQMEfy Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:16:29 No.32384627 Report

Quoted By:

It's kinda cute.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:21:00 No.32384671 Report

Quoted By:

Besides the stock g1 eyes, i think its pretty good. The armored body and proportions made it stand out quite a lot in the old games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:23:43 No.32384694 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
stfu, bitch. It looks cool.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO rawr.gif, 1MiB, 500x281

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:32:52 No.32384741 Report

Quoted By: >>32384747 >>32384750

>>32382982
Anyone else get the idea that fossil mon are all part rock because the revival process can't fully restore and separate them from their fossilized remains?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:33:45 No.32384747 Report

Quoted By: >>32384782

>>32384741
That's the idea, yeah

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:34:11 No.32384750 Report

Quoted By: >>32384782

>>32384741
I thought so too until Relicanth, who was never fossilized.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:40:05 No.32384782 Report

Quoted By: >>32384852

>>32384747
But if that's the case, and what we see isn't their "true" form, it really makes me wonder what they'd look like.

>>32384750
Good fucking point. I don't really understand why they'd force "all prehistoric Pokemon must be and were all part rock", though. Softly ruins the idea of imagined diversity in a prehistoric species list.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:54:50 No.32384852 Report

Quoted By:

>>32384782

Relicanth isn't a rock type because he's a prehistoric pokemon. He's a prehistoric pokemon that just happens to have always been a rock type. That's the point of the pokemon, it hasn't changed for millions of years. He has always meant to be a Water/Rock type. Kind of like Bastiodon, who I'm pretty sure was part rock even before it got fossilized (Cant prove it though.)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:00:32 No.32384881 Report

Quoted By:

>>32382982
Maybe it's cause it's a god damn prehistoric bug creature you dingus

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 04:48:25 No.32385479 Report

Quoted By:

but omanyte is easily cutest unevolved fossil
>>32383297

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches