>>32466027>the person still went out of their way to draw it, which gives it it's own valueNo. No it doesn't. It still means nothing to me.
>that's just your opinion, which can also be worth nothingNo shit. Did you figure that out yourself?
>They're blank slates without spoken lines of dialogDialog isn't the only way to add characterization and personality. Surprising fact, I know. Mind = blown, right?
>if this black Rosa was implemented in game, zero things about BW2 would be differentHer looks would be different. That's not "zero".
>Looks, even gender, are inconsequentialTo you.
Going back to Zard, if it had a huge fucking dick growing on its belly and had no head or limbs, and it levitated and shot flames with from the dick instead, it would still be inconsequential to the gameplay. It wouldn't be to the character, or me. I would hate that shit.
>Does that mean any and all fanart is just fucking retarded to you?No.
>Or is it just things you personally dislike?Not every type of behavior I just dislike is retarded to me, and I don't dislike every behavior I find retarded, so no.
To be accurate, it's more to do with things I personally find pathetic. Like feeling the need to change a character's birth features simply to calm your autism. I find that retarded.
>Have you messaged that artist, calling them autistic yet?I did message him when he was active, actually. Offered my butthole. I loved the man.
Have you ever heard of something called "context"? It plays a big part in these things. This artist used to make a lot of fucked up art. I found it funny. Pic related is another example. It was meant to be bizarre and funny, and I like bizarre and funny things, so I liked these.
This where things differ. A black skinned Rosa doesn't need to exist, as far as I'm concerned. The fact that some black faggot felt left out because Rosa wasn't black sounds pathetic to me.
>you seem autistic because you have things you dislikeI guess I am autistic, then.
